<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1503 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790434</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in an alleged GST fake-invoice and wrongful ITC matter was declined where statements recorded under GST law, portal data, bank records and WhatsApp communications prima facie indicated that the firm issued bogus invoices and passed ITC without actual supply of goods. The allegations involved control over firm operations and significant revenue loss, treating the conduct as a serious economic offence requiring a strict approach at the bail stage. The non-compoundable nature of the alleged offence and the ongoing need for custodial interrogation were material; documentary evidence did not eliminate that investigative requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:52:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1503 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790434</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in an alleged GST fake-invoice and wrongful ITC matter was declined where statements recorded under GST law, portal data, bank records and WhatsApp communications prima facie indicated that the firm issued bogus invoices and passed ITC without actual supply of goods. The allegations involved control over firm operations and significant revenue loss, treating the conduct as a serious economic offence requiring a strict approach at the bail stage. The non-compoundable nature of the alleged offence and the ongoing need for custodial interrogation were material; documentary evidence did not eliminate that investigative requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>