<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 140 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51332</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. applies to moulds, dies and press tools manufactured in a factory and used within that same factory, because the controlling test is captive use in the factory of production. Raising invoices or treating the goods as sold does not defeat the exemption where actual use remains confined to the factory. The cited precedent was followed as supporting this principle, and the exemption was held admissible on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 140 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51332</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. applies to moulds, dies and press tools manufactured in a factory and used within that same factory, because the controlling test is captive use in the factory of production. Raising invoices or treating the goods as sold does not defeat the exemption where actual use remains confined to the factory. The cited precedent was followed as supporting this principle, and the exemption was held admissible on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>