<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 90 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51330</link>
    <description>A product is not disqualified from exemption under Notification No. 175/86 merely because it states that it was manufactured in technical collaboration with a foreign company. The exclusion applies only where the foreign collaborator&#039;s identity is prominently or distinctively shown on the goods. Where the goods bear only the assessee&#039;s own logo and name, and no trademark or distinctive identity of the collaborator appears, the benefit of the notification remains available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:23:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 90 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51330</link>
      <description>A product is not disqualified from exemption under Notification No. 175/86 merely because it states that it was manufactured in technical collaboration with a foreign company. The exclusion applies only where the foreign collaborator&#039;s identity is prominently or distinctively shown on the goods. Where the goods bear only the assessee&#039;s own logo and name, and no trademark or distinctive identity of the collaborator appears, the benefit of the notification remains available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>