<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delayed IGST refund attracts statutory interest where refund entitlement has attained finality and payment comes after the prescribed period.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99100</link>
    <description>On a conjoint reading of Sections 54 and 56 of the CGST Act, delayed processing of a refund claim gives rise to statutory interest once the refund is paid beyond the prescribed period. The shipping bill assessment was treated as the refund application, and the petitioner&#039;s entitlement had attained finality after appellate orders were upheld and the Department&#039;s challenge failed. As the IGST refund was released only during pendency of the petition, Section 56 applied and interest was payable. The HC rejected the Department&#039;s plea that administrative delay or bona fide withholding displaced the statutory mandate, and allowed the writ petition with relief for interest on the belated refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:15:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:15:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Delayed IGST refund attracts statutory interest where refund entitlement has attained finality and payment comes after the prescribed period.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99100</link>
      <description>On a conjoint reading of Sections 54 and 56 of the CGST Act, delayed processing of a refund claim gives rise to statutory interest once the refund is paid beyond the prescribed period. The shipping bill assessment was treated as the refund application, and the petitioner&#039;s entitlement had attained finality after appellate orders were upheld and the Department&#039;s challenge failed. As the IGST refund was released only during pendency of the petition, Section 56 applied and interest was payable. The HC rejected the Department&#039;s plea that administrative delay or bona fide withholding displaced the statutory mandate, and allowed the writ petition with relief for interest on the belated refund.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:15:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>