<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 138 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51328</link>
    <description>An order that has already been carried in appeal and decided by the Tribunal merges into the Tribunal&#039;s final order and ceases to exist independently. A subsequent review by the Central Board of Excise &amp; Customs under Section 35E(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot revive that merged order for the purpose of filing a fresh Revenue appeal. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 138 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51328</link>
      <description>An order that has already been carried in appeal and decided by the Tribunal merges into the Tribunal&#039;s final order and ceases to exist independently. A subsequent review by the Central Board of Excise &amp; Customs under Section 35E(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot revive that merged order for the purpose of filing a fresh Revenue appeal. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>