<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1477 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468227</link>
    <description>Petitions were disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to reply to the show cause notices before the Adjudicating Authority and raise all available objections, including a challenge to the laboratory report and the testing methodology. The court left the merits open for consideration by the authority, preserving the petitioners&#039; right to contest the evidentiary basis of the notices at the adjudication stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:05:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1477 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468227</link>
      <description>Petitions were disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to reply to the show cause notices before the Adjudicating Authority and raise all available objections, including a challenge to the laboratory report and the testing methodology. The court left the merits open for consideration by the authority, preserving the petitioners&#039; right to contest the evidentiary basis of the notices at the adjudication stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>