https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468226 Section 364(2) of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 applies the limitation rule in Section 363(2) mutatis mutandis, so the court must preserve the statutory policy while making only necessary adjustments. On that approach, limitation in proceedings concerning illegal works begins from completion of the work where the work is unlawful from inception, but from expiry of the notice period where legality depends on non-compliance with notice. The commentary also notes that a prior proceeding concerning the same encroachments can bar renewed proceedings in respect of the identical structures, supporting refusal of further interference. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Apr 2026 10:50:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468226 Section 364(2) of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 applies the limitation rule in Section 363(2) mutatis mutandis, so the court must preserve the statutory policy while making only necessary adjustments. On that approach, limitation in proceedings concerning illegal works begins from completion of the work where the work is unlawful from inception, but from expiry of the notice period where legality depends on non-compliance with notice. The commentary also notes that a prior proceeding concerning the same encroachments can bar renewed proceedings in respect of the identical structures, supporting refusal of further interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Mar 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468226