<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1364 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790295</link>
    <description>Transaction value of imported goods cannot be rejected unless customs has a legally sustainable basis to doubt its truth or accuracy. A test report describing the goods as PVC coated fabrics did not establish mis-declaration, the absence of the manufacturer&#039;s invoice was not enough to displace the declared value, and alert circulars with NIDB data did not, on these facts, justify re-determination. The alternative valuation method also had to follow the prescribed contemporaneous-imports scheme, and selective reliance on representative values was inconsistent with that method. The rejection of transaction value, related duty demand, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=898018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1364 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790295</link>
      <description>Transaction value of imported goods cannot be rejected unless customs has a legally sustainable basis to doubt its truth or accuracy. A test report describing the goods as PVC coated fabrics did not establish mis-declaration, the absence of the manufacturer&#039;s invoice was not enough to displace the declared value, and alert circulars with NIDB data did not, on these facts, justify re-determination. The alternative valuation method also had to follow the prescribed contemporaneous-imports scheme, and selective reliance on representative values was inconsistent with that method. The rejection of transaction value, related duty demand, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>