https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790304 The dispute concerned whether a DGFT notification could retrospectively withdraw MEIS benefits for FIBC bags and whether such withdrawal was arbitrary. The Delhi High Court held that the notification could not operate retrospectively and would apply prospectively, and directed processing of MEIS claims filed pursuant to the interim order for exports made between 7 March 2019 and the notification date, subject to conditions. The Supreme Court noted a 149-day delay without sufficient cause and dismissed the Special Leave Petition on delay as well as on merits. en-us Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:07:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790304 The dispute concerned whether a DGFT notification could retrospectively withdraw MEIS benefits for FIBC bags and whether such withdrawal was arbitrary. The Delhi High Court held that the notification could not operate retrospectively and would apply prospectively, and directed processing of MEIS claims filed pursuant to the interim order for exports made between 7 March 2019 and the notification date, subject to conditions. The Supreme Court noted a 149-day delay without sufficient cause and dismissed the Special Leave Petition on delay as well as on merits. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790304