<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1400 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790331</link>
    <description>Where Form 16 and Form 26AS reflected tax deduction and advance tax payments, the absence of an earlier claim was not treated as conclusive against the assessee. The assessee was entitled to one further opportunity to substantiate the claimed salary exemption, employment tax, savings interest, section 80C deduction and house property loss from employer records. The ex parte assessment was therefore remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh, de novo adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:45:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1400 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790331</link>
      <description>Where Form 16 and Form 26AS reflected tax deduction and advance tax payments, the absence of an earlier claim was not treated as conclusive against the assessee. The assessee was entitled to one further opportunity to substantiate the claimed salary exemption, employment tax, savings interest, section 80C deduction and house property loss from employer records. The ex parte assessment was therefore remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh, de novo adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>