<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 150 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51320</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the validity of Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000, confirmed jurisdiction for the revival of assessment proceedings, found the review notice adequately justified, distinguished the TISCO case, and deferred the consideration of the time-barred issue to the Deputy Commissioner. The appeal was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order to pass a fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 150 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51320</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the validity of Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000, confirmed jurisdiction for the revival of assessment proceedings, found the review notice adequately justified, distinguished the TISCO case, and deferred the consideration of the time-barred issue to the Deputy Commissioner. The appeal was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order to pass a fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>