<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1412 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790343</link>
    <description>The Telangana HC noted that the petitioner should pursue the statutory appellate remedy against the order-in-original and the rejection of benefit under Section 128A. It allowed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority within two weeks with a delay condonation application and the required statutory pre-deposit. Coercive action pursuant to the garnishee notice was directed to remain in abeyance during that period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1412 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790343</link>
      <description>The Telangana HC noted that the petitioner should pursue the statutory appellate remedy against the order-in-original and the rejection of benefit under Section 128A. It allowed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority within two weeks with a delay condonation application and the required statutory pre-deposit. Coercive action pursuant to the garnishee notice was directed to remain in abeyance during that period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>