<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1414 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790345</link>
    <description>A writ petition was disposed of by permitting the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy, together with an application for condonation of delay. The Court also directed that no coercive steps be taken for the limited period allowed to file the appeal, preserving the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to seek appellate redress through the prescribed statutory route.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1414 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790345</link>
      <description>A writ petition was disposed of by permitting the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy, together with an application for condonation of delay. The Court also directed that no coercive steps be taken for the limited period allowed to file the appeal, preserving the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to seek appellate redress through the prescribed statutory route.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>