https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790349 Writ jurisdiction was held unavailable to bypass the GST appellate framework where notices and the demand order had been issued on the portal and the petitioner produced no material to show non-service. The appeal had already been rejected for want of mandatory pre-deposit and on limitation, and the Court found that an effective further statutory remedy before the GST Tribunal remained available. The allegation that the demand exceeded the show-cause notice was not treated as sufficient to override the statutory remedy structure. The writ petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed. en-us Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:45:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790349 Writ jurisdiction was held unavailable to bypass the GST appellate framework where notices and the demand order had been issued on the portal and the petitioner produced no material to show non-service. The appeal had already been rejected for want of mandatory pre-deposit and on limitation, and the Court found that an effective further statutory remedy before the GST Tribunal remained available. The allegation that the demand exceeded the show-cause notice was not treated as sufficient to override the statutory remedy structure. The writ petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790349