https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790353 Two assessment orders could not survive for the same tax period and overlapping discrepancies against the same assessee; the redundant order was quashed, while the order containing an additional discrepancy was retained. An ex parte assessment involving turnover mismatch, input tax credit mismatch and late fee claims was set aside because the assessee had not been effectively heard and supporting records had not been considered; the matter was remanded for fresh decision on merits, with consequential lifting of the bank attachment. en-us Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:45:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790353 Two assessment orders could not survive for the same tax period and overlapping discrepancies against the same assessee; the redundant order was quashed, while the order containing an additional discrepancy was retained. An ex parte assessment involving turnover mismatch, input tax credit mismatch and late fee claims was set aside because the assessee had not been effectively heard and supporting records had not been considered; the matter was remanded for fresh decision on merits, with consequential lifting of the bank attachment. Case-Laws GST Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790353