<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 117 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51313</link>
    <description>Duty-free clearance of brass scrap under advance licences remained subject to a fixed export obligation period, and the bond could be enforced only within the prescribed limitation period after that period expired. Because the show cause-cum-demand notice was issued after expiry of the statutory period, the customs demand was barred by limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act. The consequential penalty also could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:28:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 117 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51313</link>
      <description>Duty-free clearance of brass scrap under advance licences remained subject to a fixed export obligation period, and the bond could be enforced only within the prescribed limitation period after that period expired. Because the show cause-cum-demand notice was issued after expiry of the statutory period, the customs demand was barred by limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act. The consequential penalty also could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>