https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51311 Imported feeder cables were treated as a sub-system of digital microwave equipment, not as insulated electric conductors under Tariff Heading 85.44, because the technical write-up, sample examination and Department of Telecommunication certificate consistently described them as dielectric feeder cables. The Revenue did not produce material to undermine that technical evidence or show that the cited prior classification ruling concerned similar facts. On that record, the goods were accepted as feeder cables rather than coaxial cables, and the Revenue's challenge to the classification failed. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:24:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51311 Imported feeder cables were treated as a sub-system of digital microwave equipment, not as insulated electric conductors under Tariff Heading 85.44, because the technical write-up, sample examination and Department of Telecommunication certificate consistently described them as dielectric feeder cables. The Revenue did not produce material to undermine that technical evidence or show that the cited prior classification ruling concerned similar facts. On that record, the goods were accepted as feeder cables rather than coaxial cables, and the Revenue's challenge to the classification failed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51311