<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1276 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790207</link>
    <description>Service tax liability cannot be established solely from discrepancies between income tax returns, Form 26AS and ST-3 returns; the taxable value must be verified by reference to the actual service, recipient, consideration and any relevant exclusions, exemptions or reverse charge treatment. On that basis, a demand based only on return mismatch was not sustainable. The extended period of limitation also requires positive material showing suppression, wilful misstatement, fraud or deliberate intent to evade tax; mere non-reconciliation of figures or reliance on third-party data is insufficient. In the absence of such ingredients, the extended period was not invocable, and the demand, interest and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1276 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790207</link>
      <description>Service tax liability cannot be established solely from discrepancies between income tax returns, Form 26AS and ST-3 returns; the taxable value must be verified by reference to the actual service, recipient, consideration and any relevant exclusions, exemptions or reverse charge treatment. On that basis, a demand based only on return mismatch was not sustainable. The extended period of limitation also requires positive material showing suppression, wilful misstatement, fraud or deliberate intent to evade tax; mere non-reconciliation of figures or reliance on third-party data is insufficient. In the absence of such ingredients, the extended period was not invocable, and the demand, interest and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>