<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1278 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790209</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction in writ proceedings depends on the substance of the lis and the dominant material facts giving rise to the grievance; the mere presence of the respondent authority within Delhi was not enough where the search, seizure, investigation, and related proceedings were centred at Gurugram. The Court held that the essential and integral part of the cause of action had arisen outside Delhi, and that a small incidental connection within jurisdiction did not require the petition to be entertained when forum conveniens pointed elsewhere. The petition was therefore dismissed for want of territorial nexus, with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1278 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790209</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction in writ proceedings depends on the substance of the lis and the dominant material facts giving rise to the grievance; the mere presence of the respondent authority within Delhi was not enough where the search, seizure, investigation, and related proceedings were centred at Gurugram. The Court held that the essential and integral part of the cause of action had arisen outside Delhi, and that a small incidental connection within jurisdiction did not require the petition to be entertained when forum conveniens pointed elsewhere. The petition was therefore dismissed for want of territorial nexus, with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>