<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1284 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790215</link>
    <description>Approved resolution plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bind stakeholders and must be implemented within their stipulated timelines. A verification clause in the plan may permit scrutiny of original documents, but it does not authorise a successful resolution applicant to indefinitely re-open or withhold implementation of an already admitted homebuyer claim. Where the resolution professional has verified and admitted the claim, the claimant&#039;s name appears in the creditor records, and supporting documents show full payment, the admitted homebuyer entitlement under the plan remains enforceable. The note emphasises that late re-scrutiny cannot be used to defeat a crystallised claim absent legally sustainable proof of fraud.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1284 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790215</link>
      <description>Approved resolution plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bind stakeholders and must be implemented within their stipulated timelines. A verification clause in the plan may permit scrutiny of original documents, but it does not authorise a successful resolution applicant to indefinitely re-open or withhold implementation of an already admitted homebuyer claim. Where the resolution professional has verified and admitted the claim, the claimant&#039;s name appears in the creditor records, and supporting documents show full payment, the admitted homebuyer entitlement under the plan remains enforceable. The note emphasises that late re-scrutiny cannot be used to defeat a crystallised claim absent legally sustainable proof of fraud.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>