https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790221 The adjudication order was vulnerable for breach of natural justice because the hearing notice was received on the same date as the scheduled hearing, no earlier service was shown, and the reply dated 7 October 2024 was not considered before the order was passed. The absence of a meaningful opportunity of hearing, coupled with the order being non-speaking and unsupported by reasons, justified interference. The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order and directed fresh de novo adjudication after issuing a fresh personal hearing notice and passing a reasoned order. en-us Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790221 The adjudication order was vulnerable for breach of natural justice because the hearing notice was received on the same date as the scheduled hearing, no earlier service was shown, and the reply dated 7 October 2024 was not considered before the order was passed. The absence of a meaningful opportunity of hearing, coupled with the order being non-speaking and unsupported by reasons, justified interference. The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order and directed fresh de novo adjudication after issuing a fresh personal hearing notice and passing a reasoned order. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790221