<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 157 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51302</link>
    <description>Rail assembly front seat adjusters, assembly sliders and rear back seat lock assemblies were treated as accessories rather than parts of seats because they merely improved adjustment, comfort and convenient use and were not essential components of the seats. The decisive distinction was that a part is integral to the main article, while an accessory is only an addition or adjunct. On that basis, the goods were classifiable as accessories of motor vehicles under Chapter Heading 8708 and not as parts of seats under Chapter Heading 9401, so the demand founded on the contrary classification could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:07:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 157 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51302</link>
      <description>Rail assembly front seat adjusters, assembly sliders and rear back seat lock assemblies were treated as accessories rather than parts of seats because they merely improved adjustment, comfort and convenient use and were not essential components of the seats. The decisive distinction was that a part is integral to the main article, while an accessory is only an addition or adjunct. On that basis, the goods were classifiable as accessories of motor vehicles under Chapter Heading 8708 and not as parts of seats under Chapter Heading 9401, so the demand founded on the contrary classification could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>