<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1341 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790272</link>
    <description>A taxpayer&#039;s accrued entitlement to re-credit of Input Tax Credit in the electronic credit ledger was held not to be defeated by the GST portal&#039;s lack of functionality for refund claims rejected after debit through DRC-03. The department did not dispute the entitlement; the only obstacle was the absence of a system-based option for re-credit in the relevant factual situation. The Court treated this procedural limitation as incapable of overriding a vested entitlement and indicated that manual intervention could be used to give effect to the re-credit. The practical effect was recognition of re-credit in the ledger despite the portal&#039;s technical limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1341 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790272</link>
      <description>A taxpayer&#039;s accrued entitlement to re-credit of Input Tax Credit in the electronic credit ledger was held not to be defeated by the GST portal&#039;s lack of functionality for refund claims rejected after debit through DRC-03. The department did not dispute the entitlement; the only obstacle was the absence of a system-based option for re-credit in the relevant factual situation. The Court treated this procedural limitation as incapable of overriding a vested entitlement and indicated that manual intervention could be used to give effect to the re-credit. The practical effect was recognition of re-credit in the ledger despite the portal&#039;s technical limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>