<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1347 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790278</link>
    <description>In prosecutions for grave GST evasion, bail remains discretionary because custody-based provisions under BNSS do not create an indefeasible right to release. Where investigation materials, electronic evidence, and statements prima facie indicate a structured network using fake firms, bogus invoices, and false e-way bills, the alleged conduct may be treated as a serious economic offence warranting a stricter approach. The period already spent in custody, by itself, is insufficient to justify enlargement on bail where the risk of tampering and the interests of justice weigh against release. Bail was therefore declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1347 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790278</link>
      <description>In prosecutions for grave GST evasion, bail remains discretionary because custody-based provisions under BNSS do not create an indefeasible right to release. Where investigation materials, electronic evidence, and statements prima facie indicate a structured network using fake firms, bogus invoices, and false e-way bills, the alleged conduct may be treated as a serious economic offence warranting a stricter approach. The period already spent in custody, by itself, is insufficient to justify enlargement on bail where the risk of tampering and the interests of justice weigh against release. Bail was therefore declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>