<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Aggregated TNMM accepted for linked transactions, with nil ALP and separate receivables adjustment both rejected.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99034</link>
    <description>Integrated international transactions forming a single chain of product design, validation, manufacturing and sale were held to be benchmarkable under aggregated TNMM, and selective segregation of management, testing and validation services was rejected because the assessee&#039;s operating margin exceeded the comparable mean. The Transfer Pricing Officer could not fix arm&#039;s length price at nil without applying a recognised method, especially where records showed actual rendition of services. Outstanding receivables were treated as closely linked to the principal transaction and not separately benchmarked; with working capital adjustment already allowed and the assessee being debt-free, no notional interest adjustment survived. The appeal was allowed and the transfer pricing additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Aggregated TNMM accepted for linked transactions, with nil ALP and separate receivables adjustment both rejected.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99034</link>
      <description>Integrated international transactions forming a single chain of product design, validation, manufacturing and sale were held to be benchmarkable under aggregated TNMM, and selective segregation of management, testing and validation services was rejected because the assessee&#039;s operating margin exceeded the comparable mean. The Transfer Pricing Officer could not fix arm&#039;s length price at nil without applying a recognised method, especially where records showed actual rendition of services. Outstanding receivables were treated as closely linked to the principal transaction and not separately benchmarked; with working capital adjustment already allowed and the assessee being debt-free, no notional interest adjustment survived. The appeal was allowed and the transfer pricing additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>