https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468201 Article 22(1) and Section 50 of the Code require the grounds of arrest to be communicated in writing at the time of arrest; a mere arrest memo or intimation to a family member does not satisfy that mandate. Because the arrest memo and related communications recorded only the fact of arrest and not the grounds, the Court held that the petitioner was deprived of a meaningful chance to oppose custodial remand and seek legal protection. The arrest was therefore illegal, and the consequential remand orders were unsustainable and liable to be quashed. en-us Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Apr 2026 15:42:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468201 Article 22(1) and Section 50 of the Code require the grounds of arrest to be communicated in writing at the time of arrest; a mere arrest memo or intimation to a family member does not satisfy that mandate. Because the arrest memo and related communications recorded only the fact of arrest and not the grounds, the Court held that the petitioner was deprived of a meaningful chance to oppose custodial remand and seek legal protection. The arrest was therefore illegal, and the consequential remand orders were unsustainable and liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468201