<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1814 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468205</link>
    <description>Where service of the original GST order was not established and the statutory intimation was uploaded only later, the delay in filing the appeal could not be attributed to the appellant and was condoned. A cryptic appellate order rejecting the appeal solely on limitation, without addressing the service and upload objections, was held unsustainable and was quashed. With the limitation objection removed, the matter was remitted to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication on merits with proper application of mind.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:32:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1814 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468205</link>
      <description>Where service of the original GST order was not established and the statutory intimation was uploaded only later, the delay in filing the appeal could not be attributed to the appellant and was condoned. A cryptic appellate order rejecting the appeal solely on limitation, without addressing the service and upload objections, was held unsustainable and was quashed. With the limitation objection removed, the matter was remitted to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication on merits with proper application of mind.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>