<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 155 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Kwality Ice Cream Co. and Brooke Bond Lipton India Ltd. are not related persons, the transaction is on a principal-to-principal basis, and the price was the sole consideration for the sale of goods. Consequently, the assessable value cannot be computed based on the price at which BBLIL sold the product from its depot. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:54:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 155 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Kwality Ice Cream Co. and Brooke Bond Lipton India Ltd. are not related persons, the transaction is on a principal-to-principal basis, and the price was the sole consideration for the sale of goods. Consequently, the assessable value cannot be computed based on the price at which BBLIL sold the product from its depot. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>