<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1812 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468195</link>
    <description>Attachment under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 was sustained because the alleged inflation of newspaper circulation figures was supported by traced advertisement receipts, bank transfers and recorded statements, while the appellants failed to produce material showing actual circulation or corresponding printing inputs. The challenge to valuation also failed: the tribunal applied the statutory concept of value as fair market value on the relevant acquisition date, or possession date if necessary, and found no material to show a lower market value or that the attachment exceeded the alleged proceeds of crime. The appeal was dismissed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 18:59:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1812 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468195</link>
      <description>Attachment under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 was sustained because the alleged inflation of newspaper circulation figures was supported by traced advertisement receipts, bank transfers and recorded statements, while the appellants failed to produce material showing actual circulation or corresponding printing inputs. The challenge to valuation also failed: the tribunal applied the statutory concept of value as fair market value on the relevant acquisition date, or possession date if necessary, and found no material to show a lower market value or that the attachment exceeded the alleged proceeds of crime. The appeal was dismissed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>