<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 129 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Vaicom Electronics (P) Ltd., noting the lack of evidence supporting mutuality of interest with M/s. Baron International Ltd. The Review Order exceeded the scope of the Show Cause Notice and introduced new elements not present in the original proceedings. The Tribunal set aside the order, emphasizing the absence of findings establishing the appellants as a dummy unit of M/s. BIL, contravening the limitations of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:59:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 129 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Vaicom Electronics (P) Ltd., noting the lack of evidence supporting mutuality of interest with M/s. Baron International Ltd. The Review Order exceeded the scope of the Show Cause Notice and introduced new elements not present in the original proceedings. The Tribunal set aside the order, emphasizing the absence of findings establishing the appellants as a dummy unit of M/s. BIL, contravening the limitations of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>