<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Failure to consider reply and documents led to remand; fresh adjudication must stay within the show-cause notice.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99015</link>
    <description>An adjudication order was set aside because the authority failed to consider the taxpayer&#039;s replies and supporting documents on the alleged mismatch between GSTR-1 output tax and tax paid through GSTR-3B. The Court held that fresh consideration was required, with a new reply permitted, all submitted materials examined, and a personal hearing afforded before a fresh finding. It also clarified that verification from suppliers could be undertaken in accordance with law, but the authority could not travel beyond the show-cause notice. The matter was remitted for de novo adjudication, with merits left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:40:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:40:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Failure to consider reply and documents led to remand; fresh adjudication must stay within the show-cause notice.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99015</link>
      <description>An adjudication order was set aside because the authority failed to consider the taxpayer&#039;s replies and supporting documents on the alleged mismatch between GSTR-1 output tax and tax paid through GSTR-3B. The Court held that fresh consideration was required, with a new reply permitted, all submitted materials examined, and a personal hearing afforded before a fresh finding. It also clarified that verification from suppliers could be undertaken in accordance with law, but the authority could not travel beyond the show-cause notice. The matter was remitted for de novo adjudication, with merits left open.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:40:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>