https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99013 Under the GST regime, intelligence-based enforcement may be initiated by either Central or State tax authorities even where the taxpayer is registered with the other administration, so the State authority's jurisdiction to begin proceedings and issue orders was upheld. Classification disputes and objections to invocation of Section 74 involved disputed factual questions and were not entertained in writ jurisdiction under Article 226. Those grounds, including the plea that the reply was not properly considered, were held to be matters for statutory appeal, and the writ petitions were dismissed with liberty to appeal. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:39:25 +0530 Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:39:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99013 Under the GST regime, intelligence-based enforcement may be initiated by either Central or State tax authorities even where the taxpayer is registered with the other administration, so the State authority's jurisdiction to begin proceedings and issue orders was upheld. Classification disputes and objections to invocation of Section 74 involved disputed factual questions and were not entertained in writ jurisdiction under Article 226. Those grounds, including the plea that the reply was not properly considered, were held to be matters for statutory appeal, and the writ petitions were dismissed with liberty to appeal. Highlights GST Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:39:25 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99013