<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GSTAT Pre-Deposit Under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act: Whether ECL Is a Permissible Mode After Yasho Industries, the Re-Credit Vacuum When Appeal Succeeds, and Compliance Risks for Backlog Appellants</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16245</link>
    <description>Whether the Yasho Industries principle permitting pre-deposit from the Electronic Credit Ledger for first appeals under section 107(6) extends to GSTAT appeals under section 112(8) remains unresolved. The article notes that both provisions use similar language requiring payment of a percentage of disputed tax without specifying the payment mode, supporting an argument for allowing ECL debits at the Tribunal stage. It also records the administrative position requiring cash-based payment through Bharatkosh, creating practical filing risk for appellants relying on ECL.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 08:50:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 08:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GSTAT Pre-Deposit Under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act: Whether ECL Is a Permissible Mode After Yasho Industries, the Re-Credit Vacuum When Appeal Succeeds, and Compliance Risks for Backlog Appellants</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16245</link>
      <description>Whether the Yasho Industries principle permitting pre-deposit from the Electronic Credit Ledger for first appeals under section 107(6) extends to GSTAT appeals under section 112(8) remains unresolved. The article notes that both provisions use similar language requiring payment of a percentage of disputed tax without specifying the payment mode, supporting an argument for allowing ECL debits at the Tribunal stage. It also records the administrative position requiring cash-based payment through Bharatkosh, creating practical filing risk for appellants relying on ECL.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 08:50:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>