<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1811 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468175</link>
    <description>Arrest was upheld where the investigating agency had recorded reasons under Section 41 CrPC, the accused&#039;s name surfaced in disclosure by a co-accused, and the record indicated evasion of notice by changing locations. The Court found that an arrest memo had been prepared, the grounds of arrest were conveyed, and the Magistrate recorded satisfaction before granting police remand. Section 41-A applies only when arrest is not required under Section 41(1); on these facts, non-issuance of a Section 41-A notice did not invalidate the arrest. The arrest and remand order were held lawful, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 08:48:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1811 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468175</link>
      <description>Arrest was upheld where the investigating agency had recorded reasons under Section 41 CrPC, the accused&#039;s name surfaced in disclosure by a co-accused, and the record indicated evasion of notice by changing locations. The Court found that an arrest memo had been prepared, the grounds of arrest were conveyed, and the Magistrate recorded satisfaction before granting police remand. Section 41-A applies only when arrest is not required under Section 41(1); on these facts, non-issuance of a Section 41-A notice did not invalidate the arrest. The arrest and remand order were held lawful, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>