<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2176 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468174</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court examined whether a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure and the impugned directions on decree and security warranted reconsideration at the interim stage. Notice was issued, and the operation of the impugned order was stayed until the next date of hearing on furnishing security for the amount directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:00:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2176 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468174</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court examined whether a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure and the impugned directions on decree and security warranted reconsideration at the interim stage. Notice was issued, and the operation of the impugned order was stayed until the next date of hearing on furnishing security for the amount directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>