<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1182 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790113</link>
    <description>Income from hybrid seed production on leased agricultural land was treated as agricultural income because the assessee had exclusive use of the land, bore cultivation risk, and conducted the full range of farming operations under supervision; the use of scientific methods did not alter the agricultural character, so exemption under section 10(1) applied. Trade and professional creditor balances were not taxable as unexplained cash credits where the liabilities were supported by ledger confirmations and subsequent banking payments, so section 68 did not apply. Differences in creditor balances were also explained by discounts, freight adjustments, loss of goods and later invoices, with no proof of remission or cessation of liability; the proposed addition as unexplained expenditure was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:30:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1182 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790113</link>
      <description>Income from hybrid seed production on leased agricultural land was treated as agricultural income because the assessee had exclusive use of the land, bore cultivation risk, and conducted the full range of farming operations under supervision; the use of scientific methods did not alter the agricultural character, so exemption under section 10(1) applied. Trade and professional creditor balances were not taxable as unexplained cash credits where the liabilities were supported by ledger confirmations and subsequent banking payments, so section 68 did not apply. Differences in creditor balances were also explained by discounts, freight adjustments, loss of goods and later invoices, with no proof of remission or cessation of liability; the proposed addition as unexplained expenditure was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>