<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1184 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790115</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment was held unsustainable where the assessee&#039;s income was finally assessed on book profit under section 115JB, so the normal computation did not determine tax liability. As tax was payable under the MAT regime and the alleged concealment had no effect on the tax so computed, the principle of tax sought to be evaded was not satisfied. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:30:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1184 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790115</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment was held unsustainable where the assessee&#039;s income was finally assessed on book profit under section 115JB, so the normal computation did not determine tax liability. As tax was payable under the MAT regime and the alleged concealment had no effect on the tax so computed, the principle of tax sought to be evaded was not satisfied. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>