<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 147 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51272</link>
    <description>Goods imported under a licence issued by the competent DGFT authority to regularise an earlier import were not to be treated as restricted goods merely because a specific licence existed. Once the licensing authority granted the regularisation licence, the customs appellate authority could not disregard that licence or sit in judgment over its issuance. The view that the licence itself established the restricted character of the goods was found to have no legal basis, so confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act and the penalty order could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:43:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 147 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51272</link>
      <description>Goods imported under a licence issued by the competent DGFT authority to regularise an earlier import were not to be treated as restricted goods merely because a specific licence existed. Once the licensing authority granted the regularisation licence, the customs appellate authority could not disregard that licence or sit in judgment over its issuance. The view that the licence itself established the restricted character of the goods was found to have no legal basis, so confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act and the penalty order could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>