<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1192 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790123</link>
    <description>Routine intra-group support services were held not to constitute fees for technical services under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA because the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the Indian entity. The parent company retained control and supervision over marketing and scientific know-how, and the Indian entity received no transfer of technical skill in the treaty sense. Any incidental learning by employees while following instructions was insufficient to meet the make available requirement. The finding that no technical knowledge or skill was imparted was treated as factual, and no perversity was shown; the receipts therefore were not taxable as technical services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1192 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790123</link>
      <description>Routine intra-group support services were held not to constitute fees for technical services under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA because the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the Indian entity. The parent company retained control and supervision over marketing and scientific know-how, and the Indian entity received no transfer of technical skill in the treaty sense. Any incidental learning by employees while following instructions was insufficient to meet the make available requirement. The finding that no technical knowledge or skill was imparted was treated as factual, and no perversity was shown; the receipts therefore were not taxable as technical services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>