<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1198 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790129</link>
    <description>Compounding fee collected from illegal miners and transporters under the MMDR Act was not accepted as chargeable to tax collection at source under section 206C(1C) merely by relying on the definition in section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s judgment and order, leaving the High Court&#039;s view undisturbed and not upholding the ITAT&#039;s approach on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1198 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790129</link>
      <description>Compounding fee collected from illegal miners and transporters under the MMDR Act was not accepted as chargeable to tax collection at source under section 206C(1C) merely by relying on the definition in section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s judgment and order, leaving the High Court&#039;s view undisturbed and not upholding the ITAT&#039;s approach on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>