<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1201 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790132</link>
    <description>In cases involving bogus purchases, only the profit element embedded in the disputed purchases is to be brought to tax, not the entire purchase amount, to prevent revenue leakage. The Tribunal applied that principle on the facts and sustained disallowance at 6%, and the High Court found no reason to interfere. The Supreme Court likewise declined interference, noting that a related SLP had already been dismissed on 28.11.2023 and that no grounds were made out to disturb the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1201 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790132</link>
      <description>In cases involving bogus purchases, only the profit element embedded in the disputed purchases is to be brought to tax, not the entire purchase amount, to prevent revenue leakage. The Tribunal applied that principle on the facts and sustained disallowance at 6%, and the High Court found no reason to interfere. The Supreme Court likewise declined interference, noting that a related SLP had already been dismissed on 28.11.2023 and that no grounds were made out to disturb the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>