https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468163 Lawful occupation of the premises was essential for registration and grant of a factory licence, and the applicant had to support its claim with documents evidencing possession. Because the property belonged to another party, the existing lessee was the lawful occupant, and the lease in favour of the applicant was only for obtaining registration, the applicant failed to show a valid right of occupation. The dispute over possession, including pending arbitration and civil proceedings, did not establish an entitlement to occupy the premises for licensing purposes. The rejection of the request for registration and a new factory licence was upheld. en-us Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 19 Apr 2026 21:54:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468163 Lawful occupation of the premises was essential for registration and grant of a factory licence, and the applicant had to support its claim with documents evidencing possession. Because the property belonged to another party, the existing lessee was the lawful occupant, and the lease in favour of the applicant was only for obtaining registration, the applicant failed to show a valid right of occupation. The dispute over possession, including pending arbitration and civil proceedings, did not establish an entitlement to occupy the premises for licensing purposes. The rejection of the request for registration and a new factory licence was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468163