<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Limitation for personal guarantor insolvency starts with valid guarantee invocation and expiry of the payment period, not corporate debtor default</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98918</link>
    <description>For insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors, limitation runs from the demand notice invoking the guarantee and the guarantor&#039;s failure to pay within the stipulated period, not from the corporate debtor&#039;s default record. The Appellate Tribunal held that the notice dated 25.10.2019 validly invoked the personal guarantees, the relevant default date was 24.12.2019, and the Section 95 applications filed on 31.03.2022 were therefore within limitation. It also held that the absence of the revival letter with the original application was irrelevant to limitation, and that the Adjudicating Authority erred in treating the petitions as time-barred or in finding inconsistent default dates. The impugned orders were set aside and the petitions revived for fresh consideration under Section 100.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:47:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:47:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Limitation for personal guarantor insolvency starts with valid guarantee invocation and expiry of the payment period, not corporate debtor default</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98918</link>
      <description>For insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors, limitation runs from the demand notice invoking the guarantee and the guarantor&#039;s failure to pay within the stipulated period, not from the corporate debtor&#039;s default record. The Appellate Tribunal held that the notice dated 25.10.2019 validly invoked the personal guarantees, the relevant default date was 24.12.2019, and the Section 95 applications filed on 31.03.2022 were therefore within limitation. It also held that the absence of the revival letter with the original application was irrelevant to limitation, and that the Adjudicating Authority erred in treating the petitions as time-barred or in finding inconsistent default dates. The impugned orders were set aside and the petitions revived for fresh consideration under Section 100.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:47:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>