https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790015 Fair hearing under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was satisfied where the show cause notice, complaint and relied-upon documents were served, and receipt was not credibly denied; the objection of denial of natural justice was rejected. Property acquired before the alleged offence period could still be attached where the order treated it as proceeds of crime or value thereof, because the statutory concept extends to both direct proceeds and their value; that challenge failed. Jointly held property in the wife's name was also liable to attachment where the funds were traced to the principal offender, since attachment is not confined to property standing in the accused's name. The provisional attachment was upheld. en-us Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:21:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790015 Fair hearing under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was satisfied where the show cause notice, complaint and relied-upon documents were served, and receipt was not credibly denied; the objection of denial of natural justice was rejected. Property acquired before the alleged offence period could still be attached where the order treated it as proceeds of crime or value thereof, because the statutory concept extends to both direct proceeds and their value; that challenge failed. Jointly held property in the wife's name was also liable to attachment where the funds were traced to the principal offender, since attachment is not confined to property standing in the accused's name. The provisional attachment was upheld. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790015