<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1087 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790018</link>
    <description>At the discharge stage under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the court is confined to a prima facie assessment of whether there are sufficient grounds to proceed, and it need not conduct a roving enquiry or finally determine guilt. An order must be read as a whole with the material considered, including the predicate offence, ECIR, section 50 statement, and property-related records. Where that record shows conscious consideration and a prima facie view to proceed, revisional interference is not justified merely because the court has not finally adjudicated the merits; on that basis, the discharge petition&#039;s dismissal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:21:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1087 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790018</link>
      <description>At the discharge stage under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the court is confined to a prima facie assessment of whether there are sufficient grounds to proceed, and it need not conduct a roving enquiry or finally determine guilt. An order must be read as a whole with the material considered, including the predicate offence, ECIR, section 50 statement, and property-related records. Where that record shows conscious consideration and a prima facie view to proceed, revisional interference is not justified merely because the court has not finally adjudicated the merits; on that basis, the discharge petition&#039;s dismissal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>