https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790024 A fresh company petition cannot be used to enforce or execute an earlier final order where the subsequent reliefs substantially overlap with claims already raised and rejected. The earlier judgment granted only limited relief, and the remaining claims were treated as refused under Explanation V to Section 11 CPC; the attempted re-litigation was therefore barred by res judicata, constructive res judicata, and Order II Rule 2 CPC. Any grievance for non-compliance with the earlier order had to be pursued through execution under Section 424(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rules 56 and 57 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, rather than by filing a new petition. The fresh petition was accordingly not maintainable. en-us Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:21:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790024 A fresh company petition cannot be used to enforce or execute an earlier final order where the subsequent reliefs substantially overlap with claims already raised and rejected. The earlier judgment granted only limited relief, and the remaining claims were treated as refused under Explanation V to Section 11 CPC; the attempted re-litigation was therefore barred by res judicata, constructive res judicata, and Order II Rule 2 CPC. Any grievance for non-compliance with the earlier order had to be pursued through execution under Section 424(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rules 56 and 57 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, rather than by filing a new petition. The fresh petition was accordingly not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790024