<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1098 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790029</link>
    <description>CBIC monetary-limit instructions are stated to bind departmental authorities because they implement the National Litigation Policy. For indirect tax and customs matters, the relevant threshold is the duty or tax in dispute, and later instructions are described as revising only the monetary limits while keeping the same framework and exceptions. The recognised exceptions are confined to constitutional validity challenges, claims that a notification, instruction, order or circular is illegal or ultra vires, and legal or recurring classification and refund issues. The text also states that absolute confiscation or seizure value does not create an additional implied exception, and that maintainability objections may be raised without a formal cross-objection where the point is already on record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1098 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790029</link>
      <description>CBIC monetary-limit instructions are stated to bind departmental authorities because they implement the National Litigation Policy. For indirect tax and customs matters, the relevant threshold is the duty or tax in dispute, and later instructions are described as revising only the monetary limits while keeping the same framework and exceptions. The recognised exceptions are confined to constitutional validity challenges, claims that a notification, instruction, order or circular is illegal or ultra vires, and legal or recurring classification and refund issues. The text also states that absolute confiscation or seizure value does not create an additional implied exception, and that maintainability objections may be raised without a formal cross-objection where the point is already on record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>