https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51250 The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Customs (General), New Delhi, to adjudicate the matter and impose penalties. The Tribunal found no substance in the appellant's arguments regarding prior clearance from the Development Commissioner, issuance of show cause notice, and limitation. However, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication after allowing the cross-examination of the Station Engineer, Doordarshan Kendra, New Delhi, and affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant. The appeal was disposed of in these terms. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:25:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51250 The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Customs (General), New Delhi, to adjudicate the matter and impose penalties. The Tribunal found no substance in the appellant's arguments regarding prior clearance from the Development Commissioner, issuance of show cause notice, and limitation. However, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication after allowing the cross-examination of the Station Engineer, Doordarshan Kendra, New Delhi, and affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant. The appeal was disposed of in these terms. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51250