https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790069 The HC noted that the respondents had not yet dealt with the petitioner's grievance of alleged coercive deposit under Clause 5 of the Circular dated 25 May 2022, read with the view referred to from the Delhi HC decision. It granted the revenue further time to file a reply specifically on that issue and directed the matter to stand over for further consideration. The order is procedural and does not record a final determination on the coercive deposit complaint. en-us Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:22:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790069 The HC noted that the respondents had not yet dealt with the petitioner's grievance of alleged coercive deposit under Clause 5 of the Circular dated 25 May 2022, read with the view referred to from the Delhi HC decision. It granted the revenue further time to file a reply specifically on that issue and directed the matter to stand over for further consideration. The order is procedural and does not record a final determination on the coercive deposit complaint. Case-Laws GST Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790069