<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1140 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790071</link>
    <description>Where GST registration had already been cancelled, the taxpayer was not expected to keep checking the portal, so a show cause notice had to be served by an alternative and proper mode. Because the notice was not effectively served, the proceedings under Section 73 were vitiated for breach of natural justice. The Court quashed the assessment order and consequential recovery certificate, while permitting the Department to issue a fresh notice and proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:22:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1140 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790071</link>
      <description>Where GST registration had already been cancelled, the taxpayer was not expected to keep checking the portal, so a show cause notice had to be served by an alternative and proper mode. Because the notice was not effectively served, the proceedings under Section 73 were vitiated for breach of natural justice. The Court quashed the assessment order and consequential recovery certificate, while permitting the Department to issue a fresh notice and proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>